...Social democracy is a political ideology of the political left and centre-left on the classic political spectrum. Social democracy emerged in the late 19th century from the socialist movement and continues to exert influence worldwide. Read full entry
This entry is from Wikipedia,the leading user-contributed encyclopedia.It may not have been reviewed by professional editors(See full disclaimer)

- 1.Social democracy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- In many countries, social democrats continue to exist alongside democratic ... 5 Notable social democrats. 6 See also. 6.1 Political theory ...
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S
ocial_democracy
- 2.Social Democrats, USA
- Successor to the Socialist Party, USA, the party of Eugene Debs, Norman Thomas, and Bayard Rustin and a member of the Socialist International.
- http://www.socialdemocratsusa.
org/
![]() |
What made the Social Democrats I can't really find any
specifics why they came into
power.
I know that Luxemburg and
Liebknecht were murdered so
basically the leaders of the
Sparticists were gone meaning
the Social Democrats really
had no competition for power.
Another reason may be because
german people wanted
stability, and the Social
Democrats were a moderate
party, they weren't
extremists.
This is what i think helped
them gain power.
Any other info would help me
greatly thanks.
|
|
![]() |
Although the Reichstag in pre WW1 Germany had no real power, regular elections were held. The left of centre Social Democrats always got the most votes and had the most deputies; this was also true throughout WW1. When Hindenburg and Ludendorf realized the war was lost, they advised the Kaiser to abdicate and hand power over to a civilian government (which he did). As the largest party, the Social Democrats therefore formed the first German civilian government. The Allies were happy enough with this post WW1 - the Social Democrats were committed to democracy as a form of government and, until the Nazis came along, remained the majority party in Reichstag elections. |
|
![]() |
When did the criminals in the Saw an interesting thing on
Wikipedia recently, the ANC
went from being Communists to
'Social Democrats.'
No difference really, Vladimir
Lenin was at the inception of
both movements. Both believe
in welfare states. Both
emphasize equal outcome over
equal opportunity. Both
restrict individual rights.
Both believe in the criminal
'redistribution of wealth.'
Both stemmed from ideas put
forth by Karl Marx. Both
propogate a mob mentality.
I'm also curious about how
South Africans feel about
their new socially democratic
allies in China, who have
brutally supressed their
populace since Mao Tse Tung's
revolution?
Alias Smith And Jones - the
current South African
President,Thabo Mbeki,
received training in the
former USSR, genius. They're
Communists.
Oh yes, I was being sarcastic
about the Chinese being
'social democrats.'
Loving Resistance anti-Semite:
Because the ANC calls
themselves something else,
doesn't change what they are -
Communist thugs that consort
with other brutal Communist
dictatorial regimes; China,
Cuba, Zimbabwe.
There's a reason why those
countries are your allies.
There's a reason why Thabo
Mbeki trained in the former
USSR.
Socialism is a political
system derived from hard core
Communism. Marx and Lenin were
at the inception of both.
The United States was
absolutely correct in
supporting the former National
Party, in order to prevent the
chaos and collectivist mess in
what used to be South Africa
today.
Apartheid would have
disintegrated on its own, as
it was an illogical and
unnecessarily cruel political
system despised by the
majority of whites, as well as
the suffering black majority.
It had to go.
Any collectivist political
system, like Socialism, is
based on a mob mentality, as
it negates free enterprise.
Capitalism is the only logical
political system
Never did answer my question
about Bush and Mbeki, did you?
Just as you neatly sidestepped
the issue of the lunatic Rabbi
Ahron Cohen when I called you
on it.
Also, you need to learn how to
read - saying that someone was
at the inception of something
doesn't mean that they
'started it.'
|
|
![]() |
Well, I have not read the Wikipedia yet , and will do so soon. As I understood it; the ANC had a very close alliance with the SACP, but never were communists. Save in the mind of the Verwoerd government who believed that anyone who is not calvinist, white and right wing must be communist. I would love to ask the ANC whether they ever considered themselves communist, but I will read the wikipedia insert Brad. |
|
![]() |
What is the difference between I understand that these were
the two biggest revolutionary
organizations in Russia prior
to the revolutions, but my
question is what is the
difference in their ideologies
and the way that they
conducted their revolutionary
activities. Also, if possible,
could the main leaders and
proponents of these two be
named.
Thank you in advance!!
|
|
![]() |
I'm assuming you're referring to the Bolsheviks, which were only one faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party. The other was the Mensheviks, who were fairly similar to the Socialist Revolutionaries. Bolshevik leaders included Lenin, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Kalinin, Stalin, and Lunacharsky. Socialist Revolutionary leaders included Kerensky, Gotz, Chernov, and Tereshchenko. If you mean the Mensheviks, their leader was Martov. Now onto their platforms. The Bolsheviks were a truly revolutionary organization, not just a party. They wanted quick and radical change through an armed revolution, like the one Marx had predicted decades earlier. The new society created by this revolution would be socialist, with exaltation of the workers and peasants. The Socialist Revolutionaries claimed to want communism at some point, but the believed that, in keeping with orthodox Marxist tradition, there must be a capitalist phase before communism can occur. As Russia up to that point had been feudalist, the Socialist Revolutionaries wanted to implement capitalism, and not through revolution, but through normal government operations. Another thing, the Bolsheviks wanted Russia to leave WWI (which they were losing badly) immediately. The Socialist Revolutionaries wanted to continue the war, arguing that while it may have started as a war of imperialism, it had become a war of defense. edit forgot to put how they conducted their revolutionary activities. here goes: The Socialist Revolutionaries had been very popular in the early years of the Provisional Government (which had been ruling since the czar abdicated) and so they were given control over it. Once in control, they didn't really have to be revolutionary anymore, as long as they kept power. So, in order to keep power in spite of their waning popularity, they began to delay elections indefinitely. Certain newspapers were silenced, and the government tried to assert totalitarian control, as the czar had. They might have gotten away with it, but they had very little power by the time they got desperate. The Bolsheviks simply wanted to have a massive popular revolt, and they achieved that in November 1917. Up until then, they were halfway between a political party and a revolutionary organization. Many of its leaders (including Lenin) were still hiding in western Europe when the czar abdicated, but once the atmosphere became slightly more democratic, they adapted. They appealed to workers, peasants, and soldiers, who were very large groups, and so they gained much support. Another thing I forgot to mention, the Bolsheviks wanted all power to the soviets, which were one of the few government bodies which had remained truly democratic. |
|
* Indicates a required fieldAdd your knowledge or ask a question:




