Top Resources Top Resources
Web Results
Questions/Answers
Is the existence of Proto IndoEuropean language and IndoEuropeans a hypothesis only?
Is there a genetic, not linguistic proof that there were Indo Europeans and then they splitted into different nationalities?
Yes, there's a large amount of Indo European DNA as far West as northern India, to match the spread of the Indo European language. You get the odd blond Indian and Pakistani as result. Mostly you're looking at expansion from places like Iran and the countries South/West of the Black sea. Theseare the most likely point of origin for Indo Europeans. It shows up in the DNA of North Indians and Pakistanis quite a bit. The spread of Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup R1a1 particularly has been associated with the spread of the Indo-European languages. http://64.233.183.104/search?q =cache:Ouuthtm95vIJ:en.wikiped ia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-Europea ns+indo+european+y+dna+india&h l=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=uk http://www.genomenewsnetwork.o rg/articles/05_01/Indo-Europea n.shtml Northern Europeans only speak an Indo European language though, courtesy of the Romans. We are genetically Celtic, more like the old Cro magnon people. The Indo Europeans spread into Europe really only affected the southern countries as far as population goes. Places like Italy and Greece, as can be shown by the Y chromosome haplotypes. Below, is correct, but Celtic isn't as closely related as the Latin derived language we speak now. It was 'the first wave', Latin is later. http://www.danshort.com/ie/ The Hittites in ancient Turkey spoke an Indo European language. Indo European probably spread westwards from Anatolia with the spread of farming.
Is the Proto-Indo-Europeanlanguage still hypothetical?
I thought Proto-Indo-European language (the ancestor of all Indo-European languages) was deemed a proven hypothesis, and thus named in different languages simply Indo-European (as Spanish 'indoeuropeo', French 'Indo-europ
A "proven hypothesis" is a fact. It's not a certainty and it never will be until we invent time machines, but it's a well-supported and widely accepted theory. With this kind of theory, it's not a question of proven or unproven, because you can't ever prove it. As far as the PIE reconstruction goes, there are a lot of competing reconstructions, and we'll never know which one is right, although certain features can be established with a high level of confidence.
is sanskrit is theproto-indo-european language,from which other languages hasevolved?
like greek,latin,english and many other old languages there are so many similar words in these languages.And as sanskrit originated very long back as long as vedic period one of the oldest.
There is no doubt that many Indian languages have evolved from Sanskrit, just as many European languages have evolved from Latin. But I wouldn't go so far as to say that all other languages have evolved from Sanskrit.Sanskrit is undoubtedly one of the richest and most beautiful languages of the world.
knowledge base
* Indicates a required fieldAdd your knowledge or ask a question:
  • Display Name:(letters/numbers, no special characters)
  • Your knowledge or question:*
    (min: 100 characters, max: 2,000 characters)
  • Character count: 0
© 2009 ToseekA.com
Portions of this page powered by: yahoo!