...Primitivism is, in short, the opinion that life was better or more moral during the early stages of mankind or among primitive peoples (or children) and has deteriorated with the growth of civilization. It is a response to the perennial question of whether the development of complex civilizations and technologies has benefited or harmed mankind. From primitivism springs the romanticised ideal of the Noble savage, as being a more worthy, more noble being than civilized man. Read full entry
This entry is from Wikipedia,the leading user-contributed encyclopedia.It may not have been reviewed by professional editors(See full disclaimer)
- 1.Primitivism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- ... of Primitivism in Western Art of the Modern Age. 2 Primitivism and ... 3 Some Characteristics of Primitivism in Visual Art identified in Postcolonial thought ...
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P
rimitivism
- 2.Primitivism
- Exploration into primitivist theory, as well as various works that contribute to an understanding of the tendency.
- http://www.primitivism.com/
 |
What makes the works of What are some examples of
primitivism in the works of
Hawthorne and Melville?
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
They each saw romanticism as a RADICAL return to nature and our raw fundamental essences. Obsession, revenge, insanity as a result of human nature are common motifs among them. |
|
|
|
|
|
What is the difference bewteen They may seem the same but
I've seen some articles that
suggest they're not. The sad
thing is, these articles do
not really explain why.
Please help me. THANKS a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
primitivism: 1. The condition or quality of being primitive. 2. The style characteristic of a primitive artist. 3. 1. A belief that it is best to live simply and in a natural environment. 2. A belief that the acquisitions of civilization are evil or that the earliest period of human history was the best. (this is the definition for primitive art given to me by my art history professors at ksu in my own words) Primitive art is usually used when referring to art that isn't as culturally developed/superior. This term, however, is NOT politically correct anymore. It was often used to refer to African Art until the last 10-20 years. So, it is really a snotty way to look down your nose at an art style. |
|
|
|
|
|
What do you think of |
|
|
|
|
|
I personally feel it is based on some flawed conceptions about humans and our appropriate environment. I really think it's a bit nutty, and I think that I can explain why concisely. Superficially, the ideas behind the politico-philosophic position(s) you mention flow from the idea that social hierarchy perpetuates inequality and other problems that result from lop-sided distribution of power. The primitivism or neo-tribalism comes in when people begin to advocate a "return" to "primitive" social organization and subsistence, and assumed universal social equality, collective governance, and an all over "return" to humanity's "natural" environment. Some who go this route actually try to live a less techno-industrial life themselves. Others' praxis involves trying to convince or persuade the world at large that applying the principles of anarcho-primitivism or anarcho-neo-tribalism are good for the future of humanity. some encourage through the dissemination of information and debate, and others through less nonviolent means. With systematic rejection not just of hierarchical social structure, but also of science, and technology (manufacturing, communications, domestication of plants and animals, etc.), this/these movement(s) seem to be a good example of extreme reaction to the cultural fragmentation that is a characteristic of the postmodern era. However, I don't believe that it is a very useful position, for several reasons: first of all, much of this thinking is based on ideas that might have their origins in anthropology, but are really outdated. Anthropologist have long since critiqued ideas that tout modern or past hunter-gathers as the epitome of class-less, peaceful, and "affluent" societies, but these bad ideas persist in the dreams of anarcho-primitivists. Second, members of these groups drive cars, organize meetings and actions on internet message boards, buy and eat domesticated food, etc. Very few actually try to put the philosophy into practice on any level. One of the main concepts among modern anarchists is that of praxis, or the practice of social action. I think that much more good could be done by people trying to focus social action to help the poor, clean up polluted environments, and promote safe food production and fair labor laws, just to name a few. To spend all of one's time and effort trying to destroy science and technology, pining for some non-existent forager's wild human utopia seems a great waste of passion and effort. |
|
|
|
|
* Indicates a required fieldAdd your knowledge or ask a question:
