Noun
- Domination, influence, or authority over another, especially by one political group over a society or by one nation over others (e.g.: internationally among nation-states, and regionally over social classes, between languages or even culture).
- : The two political parties battled viciously for hegemony.
Read full definition at wiktionary.org
...Hegemony (, English: [1] , [2]: ; "leadership" or "hegemon" for "leader") Clive Upton, Wiliam A. Kretzschmar, Rafal Konopka: Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English. Oxford University Press (2001) is the preponderance of power, and the construction of consent from the powerless through cultural values. Read full entry
This entry is from Wikipedia,the leading user-contributed encyclopedia.It may not have been reviewed by professional editors(See full disclaimer)


- 1.Hegemony - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Politically, hegemony is the predominance of one political unit over others. ... In Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (1985), political theorists Ernesto Laclau ...
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H
egemony
- 2.hegemony: Definition from Answers.com
- hegemony n. , pl. , -nies . The predominant influence, as of a state, region, or group, over another or others ... Hegemony has also been attributed to other ...
- http://www.answers.com/topic/h
egemony
![]() |
Hegemony?.....?
Examples of Hegemony in
society now
|
|
![]() |
Let me get out the Dictionary says related or married to a BUSH! |
|
![]() |
What is the rate of return If half the 2006 DOD budget of
$442 billion (not counting $85
billion supplemental) were
invested elsewhere
(infrastructure, education,
subsidies, direct foreign aid)
would the rate of return be
higher? Has anyone tried to
quantify the value of
geo-political capital that
hegemony provides? Is it worth
the investment?
Serious answers only please,
take your vitriol elsewhere.
don't like hegemony? Fine, I
understand that it can be
loaded... how about
preeminance?
No such thing as geo-political
capitial? I strongly disagree,
our policies and international
presence affords us semi quid
pro quo opportunities. Case in
point, the unedited Blix
Report prior to Operation
Iraqi Freedom. Kofi Annan was
in the process of being
marginalized in the US and
could not deny America's
request to see the unedited
report. The only other person
with the authority to deny us
access was the president of
the UN, at that time the
Colombian ambassador. The US
had no leg to stand on in
demanding the unedited report,
in fact the demand itself was
absurd and could ONLY be made
by (reinforcing my point) a
hyoer-power/hegemon. Colombia
couldn't say no, because Uribe
is tied at the hip to Bush...
and a debt is owed the US for
Plan Colombia and the ARI.
This is what I am describing
when I say "geo-political
capital".
|
|
![]() |
The way you ask you question is vitriol in nature, its funny how you supposedly can't take what you are dishing out. Of course I may be totally off base if you are not refering to the American Department of Defense, because in fact the DOD does not practice hegemony. Why must you phrase your question in such a way that cowardly forces the askee to agree with you position in the first place. Nice attempt at dragging the "red herring". |
|
![]() |
what is the relationship hi guys! does anybody know
what is the relationship
between the ideological
interpellation and
the hegemony of the ruling
elite?
and if u please, can u site
examples?
i find these questions very
critical, and difficult.
thanks.
|
|
![]() |
Um if oyu look at british coinage it has picture of the queen one side and defender of the faith on the other. the hegemony of the ruling elite seems always to have been god given. Bush said god told him personally to go to Iraq. In England the church and state are not separate - and Henry 8th did some nifty footwork to get a divorce. The ruling elite of the Lords claim divine right - then there is 'droit de seigneur' law that the lord can rape any peasant woman he fancies. the ruling elite make the laws in Parliament to their own ends and as structures change minds the law of the land is affected by self interest. I guess the biggest one is denyng the non property owning classes and women a vote yet still maintaining that we lived in a democracy. |
|
* Indicates a required fieldAdd your knowledge or ask a question:




