[+] enlarge |
Surveillance Mobile Cell...
Its hard to describe the Surveillance Mobile Cell Phone 2.4G Wireless Spy... More |
- Find a Person for Free
- Get current address and phone, find anyone in the USA. Search free.
- www.PeopleFinders.com
- 1.Person - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- ... other uses, see Person (disambiguation). The term person in common usage ... Person and personhood were used in concepts in the early Christian theological ...
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P
erson
- 2.Person.com
- Virtual community allows users to rate profiles with photos, chat one-on-one, play online games, discuss relationships, and more.
- http://www.person.com/
 |
Can a living person give up My girlfriend and I are
fighting about whether or not
a living person can give up
their own life to give their
heart to a person who needs a
heart transplant. She says you
can but you need to be a
certain age, I say she's
wrong, that a living person
can't just give up their life
and give their heart to
another person. I'm not the
smartest person in the world,
but I'm pretty sure you can't
do that. Help.
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Im pretty sure your right.. You would killing yourself, and I think thats illegal...lol |
|
|
|
|
|
What frequency does the person A person is running toward a
stationary car at a speed of
6.0 m/s and another car is
moving away at a speed
of 25 m/s. The horn in each
car is producing a sound with
a frequency of 920 Hz.
a) What frequency does the
person hear coming from the
stationary car?
b) What frequency does the
person hear coming from the
moving car?
c) What beat frequency does
the person hear?
d) The stationary car starts
moving towards the person at a
speed of 10.0 m/s. What is the
new beat frequency heard by
the person?
|
|
|
|
|
|
F=the frequency that the person hear. f=the car stationary frequency if the person is in front of the stationary car: F=(V(sound)+v(person)/V(sound) -v(car))f and if the person is behind the car: F=(V(sound)-V(person)/V(sound) +v(car))f Just put the numbers in these formulas |
|
|
|
|
|
How drunk does a person have How do they determine just how
drunk a person was at the time
of the alleged rape?
If a person is incapable of
rational thought and consent
and it's considered rape then
shouldn't a drunk driver have
lighter sentences since they
were drunk and not capable of
rational thought and consent
before they got in their car?
Or if a person gets in a
drunken brawl are they
considered less of a criminal
because of being intoxicated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
A person that is incapable of knowing the consequences of their actions is incapable of consenting to sex and the person who has sex with her while she is in that state may be subject to a charge of rape. The person has to be intoxicated enough that they cannot understand the significance of their actions or be unconscious. Where your examples fail is: the person having sex with the intoxicated person is the actor, not the person that is intoxicated. Therein lays the flaw in your argument. Your analogies are flawed logically because we are speaking about the victim of the rape being intoxicated and incapable of consent, not the perpetrator of the crime. The drunk driver is undertaking to drive while intoxicated which is a crime and intoxication is therefore no answer in trying to excuse their criminal behavior. Likewise the person that gets in a brawl while intoxicated has assaulted another person which is also a crime, therefore he cannot use his own voluntary intoxication as an excuse for their committing a crime. In contrast, the victim of the rape has not attempted a crime and is not seeking to excuse criminal actions. What her level of intoxication is determining is whether or not she is capable of consenting to sex as an element of the criminal charge against the person that had sex with her. The only analogy in the rape situation is: Can an intoxicated man that forces a woman to have sex against her will excuse his behavior by claiming HE was too drunk to know better? The answer is obviously no. There we are talking about whether the criminal can use intoxication as an excuse and the answer is always that the criminal may not. |
|
|
|
|
* Indicates a required fieldAdd your knowledge or ask a question:
