Questions/Answers
What does the RIAA do if youuse limewire?
I always thought that they could sue you for tons of money but recently I heard they like send you an email threatening to shut down your internet of something like that?
yeah but that is only if its your third offense as a minor but if your over sixteen then you get fined for 250,000 dollars on third offense
If I delete my file sharingprograms and illegallydownloaded songs, am I legallyin the clear from the RIAA?
I used to illegally download music, but have since decided to stop because of all the recent law suits. What do I have to do to be in the clear?
If the RIAA has records of you downloading copyrighted content, deleting, formatting or trashing your computer is all useless. You will still get slapped with a lawsuit.
On the back of some olderalbum covers there is a numberlocated next to the RIAA logo?
In particular, I'm referring to original Beatles' albums on Capitol Records. The number is a location on the lower right hand corner on the back of the album. The number (I think) is the record plant that pressed that particular record. I believe that they also tell the year a record was pressed as well. Does anybody know what the code for those numbers are, or where I can find this information?
Hi brioma33! I'm almost 100% sure that the info contained on this page is what you're looking for. http://www.beatlescollecting.c om/the-beatles/faqs/identifyin g-capitol-records.html
How do you feel about the RIAAsuing people over downloadingcopywrighted material?
I think that yes, they do have a point. Technically it is piracy, but they should be thinking how to capatilize on it rather than sue everyone. Downloading an album will never be as good as buying one. It is time consuming and tedious to download your music instead of buying it. Especially if you dont listen to mainstream.
I agree that, in premise, it's sound. However, I think that the money isn't going to the right places... The lawyers and top execs see all the cash won from that. Everything else is just for publicity. When the media can push fearsome stories about some dude getting slapped with a huge fine, they can curb a bit of the activity. However, I think there's other ways to do it. Itunes is a great start...
Why do RIAA & MPAA sue peoplefor downlaoding stuff whenthere are sites that let youdownload free & legally?
I can't BELIEVE how may sites let you download or even simply WATCH/LISTEN to movies/music! & some of them are reputable companies. & the people in the entertainment industry say that they don't get their royalties, which I understand. I'd be upset, too. So with this, how can musicians & actors make money if people don't buy CD's & DVD's anymore because all they gotta do is look/listen on the computer?
The RIAA and MPAA are greedy organizations who only work for the big corporations, not the artists themselves. Free websites are usually ad supported, which does return revenues to the companies who hold all the copyrights. Again, this does little for the artists. How legal a site is cannot be determined by the average user, but if you did not pay for it, even if the website is listed on Google without any copyright violation notices, I would not assume the download is legal. In these times, it is best to only download what you have paid for. This does not apply to streaming content over the Internet, where you cannot be sued if you don't actually download anything to your computer.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5
© 2009 ToseekA.com
Portions of this page powered by: yahoo!