 |
where can i get the copy of I need to apply for K1 visa
for my bf I need all the
documents - do you know what
else I need in order to
process this besides
1. nationalization certificate
2. divorce certificate
3. tax return
????
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Instructions on how to complete I-129F can be found in the first link below. The instructions specify what documents you need for your situation. If you need to get a copy of your naturalization certificate, you need to file N-565. The cost is $380. See the second link below. |
|
|
|
|
|
what is the difference between While the oil executives were
being grilled at a house
hearing, Rep. Maxine Waters
slipped up and started saying
"this liberal will be all
about socializing"
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is difficult to differentiate between the two.. For example, Canada has many nationalized assets ( for example oil ) which makes it a socialist country. But most experts would not call Canada the term socialist. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chavez's gold mine Have you followed this report?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I really enjoy that funny little fat man. He is a hoot. This shows what can happen when people allow an idiot to run their country. Once the communists are invited in, it is very difficult to get them to leave. |
|
|
|
|
|
What are landmark cases in the |
|
|
|
|
|
Its hard to give an answer as it has been a very uneven process. As of this date, there are some provisions that have not been nationalized and may never be nationalized. Obviously, on the negative side, you have the case of Barron v. City of Baltimore (pre-14th Amendment) in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to state government. Then you had the Slaughterhouse Cases in which the U.S. Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment as just applying to the rights of minority racial groups and read the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment out of the Constitution. On the positive side, you have the Scottsboro cases (Powell v. Alabama) in the early 30s applying some of the criminal protections to a state trial. Later, you have Mapp v. Ohio, applying the Fourth Amendment to a state trial. In the 1940s, you had the flag cases involving the Jehovah Witnesses (want to say one of the key ones was West Virginia v. Barnette) which applied the First Amendment against state governments. Obviously, given the piece by piece nature of the process, it is hard to list them all. |
|
|
|
|
|
What is the likelihood that I did the research and all I
found was
1- The Rehnquist Court has not
actually reversed important
decisions made by the Warren
or Burger Courts.
2- The current balance of
justices makes any significant
reversals unlikely.
Does anyone know what those
two sentences mean, please
help me soon?
Thank you all
|
|
|
|
|
|
bloody unlikely. |
|
|
|
|
