 |
What is the difference between I am supposed to write about
the historical trajectory of
US Federalism, but I want to
know if I can talk about the
paths of state duties to
nationalization?
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Please visit Wikipedia for definitions and operationalisation of both concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
Federalism is a two-tier system of government with states and a central capital. Federalism was developed along the lines of the League of the Iroquois (that's right, indians inspired Federalism). Again, you must seperate the idealogy from the economics. A type of governing system, such as Federalism (as opposed to a Confederacy) is different than its economics. Nationalization is when the government takes over any business and runs it essentially becoming a socialist economy. Any government controlled economy is left-leaning or socialist leaning. Nationalism is simply an identification with one's country. |
|
|
|
|
|
Federalism refers to the balance of power between the central, national government and the governments of the individual states. Nationalization refers government/public takeover of industry or other assets. I don't know what state duties nationalization would entail. Perhaps you mean nationalism, which basically means collective patriotism. The duties of loyalty the states have to the federal government and vice versa is an enormous topic. Try to narrow it down to something more specific. |
|
|
|
|
|
there is no difference. |
|
|
|
|
